Home › Blog › News

Nintendo DMCA Takes Down 144 Switch Modchip Firmware Repos on GitHub

Nintendo's first GitHub takedown aimed at modchip firmware disabled 144 Picofly repositories. What it means for Switch owners with SX Core, Picofly or HWFLY.

By The Captain ·

Nintendo DMCA notice disabling 144 GitHub repositories with Picofly and HWFLY Switch modchip firmware

Nintendo of America has used a copyright takedown notice to remove open-source firmware for Nintendo Switch modchips from GitHub. The notice, dated 6 November 2026 and published in GitHub’s public DMCA archive this week, led the platform to disable a network of 144 repositories built around the Picofly project. According to TorrentFreak, it is the first time Nintendo has gone after modchip firmware on GitHub, rather than emulators or software tools.

What Nintendo targeted

The notice names a single parent repository that hosted documentation and firmware for Picofly, a low-cost Switch modchip based on the RP2040-Zero microcontroller board. Nintendo told GitHub that the entire repository was infringing and that all or most of its forks were too. GitHub therefore processed the request against the whole fork network: the parent project plus 143 copies.

Nintendo’s complaint is not about copied game code. It argues that the firmware lets modchips defeat the console’s technological protection measures, which the notice describes as including boot sequences and cryptographic signatures. The text says the firmware is meant for modchips “including but not limited to” four products:

  • SX Core and SX Lite, the chips once sold by Team-Xecuter
  • Picofly, the open-source RP2040-based design
  • HWFLY, another third-party chip for the console

The legal basis is the anti-circumvention part of US copyright law. The notice cites 17 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1) and (a)(2), which ban bypassing access controls and trafficking in tools built mainly for that purpose. To show it owns protected works, Nintendo listed copyright registrations for games such as Mario Kart 8 Deluxe, Animal Crossing: New Horizons, Super Smash Bros. Ultimate and The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild.

The Team-Xecuter case in the background

To support its claim, Nintendo pointed to the US criminal case against Team-Xecuter, the group behind the SX Pro, SX Core and SX Lite chips. Three people were indicted in 2020. One of them, Gary Bowser, pleaded guilty to conspiracy charges linked to circumvention devices and received a 40-month prison sentence. The two other defendants, including the alleged leader Max Louarn, remain at large.

Video Games Chronicle points out that a guilty plea is not the same as a court ruling that modchips, or their firmware, are unlawful in every case. Nintendo does not need such a ruling to send a DMCA notice, though, and GitHub accepted this one. Some headlines have described the case as a trial win, but the sources describe only the earlier plea and sentence, not a new verdict.

The same day, Nintendo sent GitHub further notices. TorrentFreak reports that one hit a Citron Neo emulator network of 71 repositories, and two others targeted single repositories carrying yuzu code. Earlier in 2026, Nintendo had already removed hundreds of Switch emulator repositories from the platform in one sweep.

What it means for users

  • Modded consoles keep working. A Switch that already has a chip installed is not changed by a takedown on GitHub. Tom’s Hardware notes that the main loss is easy access to firmware updates and reflashing files.
  • Switch 2 is not affected. According to Tom’s Hardware, this modchip method does not work on the newer console.
  • Mirrors and re-uploads are risky. When a popular open-source project disappears, unofficial copies tend to appear on file hosts and forums. Firmware is flashed directly onto hardware, so a tampered build from an unknown uploader can brick a console or carry unwanted code. Treat sudden “replacement” downloads with caution.
  • Other repositories may follow. Projects that host similar firmware, forks or guides on mainstream platforms could receive the same kind of notice, so links shared in communities may stop working without warning.

What happens next

GitHub’s notice page explains that the repository owner can file a counter-notice if they believe the takedown was a mistake. When TorrentFreak checked, no counter-notice had appeared in the archive. Under the DMCA process, a counter-notice can lead to the code being restored unless Nintendo responds with legal action.

TorrentFreak also found that other Picofly and HWFLY firmware repositories, not named in the notice, were still online. That suggests further notices are possible if Nintendo decides to widen its campaign from software to hardware projects. The move fits a broader pattern in 2026, in which the company has relied on DMCA notices to platforms rather than lawsuits against individual developers.

For the homebrew and preservation community, the key question is whether open hardware documentation can stay on mainstream code platforms at all. For now, the answer on GitHub appears to be no whenever Nintendo files a notice.

Sources

Subscribe to PirateMap

Get new articles, site status reports and guides by email. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

⚓Keep reading

Leave your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *